Now available: WIPO Study of "Key Questions on Patent Disclosure Requirements for Genetic Resources and Traditional Knowledge"
Policymakers and other stakeholders often raise operational questions and seek practical and empirical information about patent disclosure requirements in relation to genetic resources and traditional knowledge. This authoritative study offers a comprehensive and scrupulously neutral overview of key legal and operational questions arising within this context.
Download the Report here: http://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4194
Residential school survivor saddened Pope won't come to Canada to issue apology
A residential school survivor says he's disgusted Pope Francis has decided not to apologize for the Catholic Church's role in the schools.
"They haven't changed their position from day one. And they never will. The only thing (the Church) could say is sorry he got caught, that's all," said Ted Quewezance, who was abused while attending St. Phillip's residential school near Kamsack.
The Pope's decision was announced this week in an open letter "to the Indigenous peoples of Canada" by Bishop Lionel Gendron, president of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops.
The call for an apology on Canadian soil was one of the 94 calls to action of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also made the request during a visit last year to the Vatican.
"The Holy Father is aware of the findings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which he takes seriously," stated the letter. "As far as Call to Action #58 is concerned, after carefully considering the request and extensive dialogue with the Bishops of Canada, he felt that he could not personally respond."
According to the letter, the Pope encouraged bishops to continue working with Indigenous elders and others and to "collaborate on concrete projects" toward reconciliation.
Apology should have been simple: survivor
Quewezance, one of the first survivors to speak openly about the abuses he faced, said the apology should have been a simple matter.
"They know they did wrong. When you do wrong, you apologize," he said.
Former Saskatoon Tribal Council Chief Felix Thomas, Regina Archdiocese Archbishop Don Bolen and others have been working for months to bring the Pope to Wanuskewin Heritage Park near Saskatoon for the apology.
Both said Wednesday they were disappointed.
"Most First Nations people that went to residential schools should be disappointed. It was a dark time in history. We were confident he would come here," said Thomas, who now sits on the Wanuskewin board.
Current STC Chief Mark Arcand said residential schools damaged the students irreparably, but that the legacy continues. He said the high rates of illness, incarceration and other maladies in Indigenous people can be traced in part to residential schools.
Pope apologized for wrongs in Ireland, Peru
Arcand noted the Pope has apologized to victims of abuse and colonization in Peru and Ireland.
"Why are First Nations people not allowed to get the same thing. We're looking for the same respect," Arcand said.
"We hope you reconsider. The door is open. You're always welcome to Treaty Six territory."
In 1991, Canadian Catholic Bishops issued an apology, saying, "We are sorry and deeply regret the pain, suffering and alienation that so many experienced" at the residential schools. The TRC call to action had called for the pope to make a public apology on Canadian soil.
Bolen said he and others in the Catholic Church will continue to reach out to the Indigenous community and make amends for the damage caused.
Reconciliation still church's top priority: Bishop
"We're not shying away from that here. I would say that our work with Indigenous people is our number one pastoral priority in the church here," Bolen said.
Saskatoon Diocese Bishop Mark Hagemoen agreed.
"I too regret that Pope Francis is not coming at this time," Hagemoen said in a written statement.
"Our Indigenous communities are highlighting the need for concrete actions and positive relationships to accompany the many words and expressions of commitment."
The Catholic Church ran more of Canada's residential schools than any other church. More than 150,000 students attended the schools, which first opened in the 1870s, according to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Saskatchewan had more students and more schools per capita than any other province.
Author: Jason Warick
MANILA (Reuters) - A U.N. special rapporteur, a former Philippine lawmaker and four former Catholic priests are among more than 600 alleged communist guerrillas the Philippines wants declared “terrorists”, according to a government petition filed in court.
The justice ministry last month said it wanted a Manila court to declare the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and its armed wing, the New People’s Army (NPA), “terrorist” bodies, but made no mention of individuals it would also target.
The petition, a copy of which was seen by Reuters, suggests President Rodrigo Duterte is following through on his threats to destroy a movement he now regards as duplicitous.
Since taking office in July 2016, Duterte freed some communist leaders and put leftists in his cabinet, to show his commitment to finding a permanent solution to a five-decade conflict.
But he abandoned the process in November, after what he called repeated attacks by the NPA during talks.
The petition said the rebels were “using acts of terror” to sow fear and panic to overthrow the government.
Duterte has been regularly venting his fury at the Maoists and considers them as much of a security threat as the domestic Islamist militant groups that have pledged allegiance to Islamic State.
By declaring groups and individuals terrorists, the government would be able to monitor them more closely, track finances and curb access to resources, among other measures.
But Carlos Conde, Philippines researcher with the New York-based Human Rights Watch, said the petition was “a virtual hit list”.
“There’s a long history in the Philippines of the state security forces and pro-government militias assassinating people labeled as NPA members or supporters,” he said in a statement.
The government petition included Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, appointed in 2014 as U.N. special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, who was listed as a senior member of the Maoist rebel group.
Tauli-Corpuz denounced the government, calling the complaint “baseless, malicious and irresponsible”.
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein defended the independence, impartiality and expertise of special rapporteurs in the face of smear and hate campaigns, some involving incitement to violence.
“Instead of attacking the messenger, states and other stakeholders should engage and address the human rights concerns raised by mandate-holders,” he said in Geneva.
Two other U.N. special rapporteurs, Michel Forst and Catalina Devandas Aguilar, expressed “grave concern” about Tauli-Corpuz being on the list, and said she was being punished by Duterte for speaking against some of his policies.
Also on the list were four former Catholic priests and former congressman Satur Ocampo, who told Reuters he would challenge any “terrorist” label.
The petition included 18 top leaders of the CPP, including founder Jose Maria Sison and peace negotiator Luis Jalandoni, both based in the Netherlands for three decades.
There was no basis for the charge of terrorism, said Sison, who was a mentor of Duterte when he was at university, although the two are now bitter rivals.
“Duterte is engaged in a wild anti-communist witchhunt under the guise of anti-terrorism,” he said. “Duterte is truly the No. 1 terrorist in the Philippines.”
Duterte’s spokesman did not respond to requests for comment.
More than 40,000 people have been killed in the Maoist rebellion. Negotiations to end the revolt have been on and off since being brokered by Norway in 1986.
Author: Manuel Mogato
Additional reporting by Stephanie Nebehay in GENEVA; Editing by Martin Petty, Robert Birsel
Stakeholders: Apply to speak or attend
18 March 2018 – Apply to speak or for Stakeholder Selection Committee
31 March 2018 – Apply to attend as an observer
PLEASE READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS IN FULL BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORM.
The President of the General Assembly is convening a two-day high-level meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday, 24-25 April 2018 at United Nations Headquarters in New York with the aim to discuss ways to support peace in practice. The format of the high-level meeting consists of an opening segment, a high-level plenary debate, four interactive dialogues and a closing segment.
At the request of the Office of the President of the General Assembly (OPGA), UN-NGLS and the United Nations Peacebuilding Support Office are facilitating a process to identify 8 stakeholder respondents to speak from the floor during the interactive dialogues, and for stakeholders to apply to attend this event as observers.
Two stakeholder respondents are to be identified for each of the following 4 interactive dialogues through this process:
1) Interactive Dialogue I - Sustainable Financing for Peace
2) Interactive Dialogue II - Strengthening the United Nations Work on Peacebuilding and Sustaining Peace in the Field
3) Interactive Dialogue III - Strategic Partnerships with the United Nations in the Field for Peace
4) Interactive Dialogue IV - UN Comprehensive and Integrated Approach to Peace
For the selected respondents:
> Travel funding will be available from the UN to support the participation of the selected stakeholder respondents in this meeting. The selected respondents will need to make their own visa arrangements, if needed for travel to the US, and cover the cost of the visa.
For approved observers:
Travel funding is NOT available from the UN to support the participation of stakeholder observers in this meeting.
Representatives not selected for the speaking roles who are approved to attend the meeting as observers will need to secure their own funding for travel, accommodation and subsistence, and also need to make their own visa arrangements, if applicable. The United Nations cannot provide invitation letters to stakeholders approved to attend the meeting as observers.
Before submitting an application to attend the event, please:
1) Review the background information for this event:
2) Confirm that the candidate meets all of the following criteria:
• is a representative of a stakeholder organization that has had a long-term programmatic focus on peacebuilding and sustaining peace;
• has demonstrated the ability to engage constructively with a variety of stakeholders;
• is available to be in New York on 24-25 April 2018;
• has a visa for travel to New York, or is able to obtain one for travel to New York without assistance from the UN. Please check with the US Embassy or Consulate in the candidate's country or place of residence.
UN-NGLS will facilitate a stakeholder Selection Committee for the evaluation and short-listing of the candidates for the respondent speaking roles to be presented to OPGA for their consideration. The Committee will ensure regional and gender balance, and diversity of constituency and expertise in the overall set of candidates. The President of the General Assembly will make the final selection of the speakers for this event.
Apply for the Stakeholder Selection Committee here by 18 March 2018:
Apply for respondent speaking roles or to attend the event using the form below. Deadlines are at the top of this form.
All applications received to speak at the event, or attend as an observer can be viewed here:
For the questions preceded by a # in the form, responses will not be made public.
1) Government bodies and intergovernmental organizations please do not use this registration form. Please observe standard protocol arrangements via your official UN delegation or organization.
2) Capacity for observers is limited for this event. During application review, considerations will include sufficiency and quality of responses to the application questions, relevant expertise, regional and gender balance, and diversity of expertise, constituency, and age.
3) Applicants will be added to the UN-NGLS email list to receive notifications of decisions. An option to unsubscribe will be provided for if you do not wish to remain on the list.
Information Source: https://fs22.formsite.com/res/formLoginNew
We all know that#TimeisNow!
There are approximately 185 million indigenous women in the world, belonging to more than 5000 different indigenous groups.
Despite the broad international consensus about the important role indigenous women play in eradicating hunger and malnutrition, there are still limitations in the recognition and exercise of their rights.
The empowerment of indigenous women is not only a central issue but also a necessary condition to eradicate hunger and malnutrition in the world!
To reach this goal and to leave no one behind, we need you!
- Make your personal or institutional registration here
- Send your logo here (so we can add it to the website)
- Smile, soon you will receive a social media kit to make#IndigenousWomen visible!
Yon Fernandez de Larrinoa
FAO Indigenous Peoples team leader
PS: And please share this video on your social-media today!
It has come to my attention that the Government of the Philippines last month filed a legal petition to have a number of organizations, associations and persons declared as terrorist and outlaws pursuant to the National Security Act of 2007. To my dismay, the list includes my name, along with the name of the UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and several other indigenous human rights defenders from across the country.
I have fought for human rights and, in particular, the rights of indigenous peoples my entire life; as former leader of the Cordillera Peoples Alliance (CPA) and the Asia Indigenous Peoples Pact (AIPP), expert member of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and currently co-convener of the Indigenous Peoples Major Group on Sustainable Development. I therefore denounce this unfounded and false accusation, which not only pose a risk to my security, but is also an affront to the exercise of the fundamental rights and freedoms associated with democratic governance, and to the human rights obligations of the Philippine government.
As noted by the UN Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders, the Philippines is currently marked by a “context of widespread extrajudicial executions and ongoing attacks against voices who are critical of the current Government, including human rights defenders”.
I expect to have the possibility to take legal action to clear my name, and expect the Government to ensure the physical safety of those of us who are listed in the petition, as called for by UN experts.
I call on the international community to show solidarity and express their concern to the Philippine Government.
See press release by the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, and the Chairperson of the Coordination Committee of the Special Procedures at:
Article in the Inquirer: http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/…/human-rights-group-slams-doj…
Reference: Joan Carling, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Online Registration for the 17th session of the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (UNPFII17) is now OPEN.
For NGOs with ECOSOC Status, IPOs and Academics that have participated at previous sessions of the Permanent Forum:
- First, review and update your contact details in the integrated Civil Society Organizations (iCSO) System: http://bit.ly/unpfii-updatecontact
- Register by 2 April 2018: https://reg.unog.ch/event/23798/registration/
For New IPOs and Academics participating for the first time at a session of the Permanent Forum:
- First, read carefully the participation guide. You must create a new profile in the integrated Civil Society Organizations (iCSO) System. Download the Participation Guide for New NGOs and Academics: http://bit.ly/unpfii17-new-ipos-academics
- Deadline for online application for approval: 28 March 2018.
Please contact at: email@example.com for questions related to your participation.
NEW POLICY "A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION"
Songdo, South Korea – Indigenous peoples welcome the adoption today of the GCF Indigenous Peoples Policy by the Green Climate Fund Board.
“As faithful stewards of nature often in the frontline of negative impacts of climate change and unsafeguarded climate change response actions, indigenous peoples have seen a ray of hope and a potentially promising future in the context of climate change and mitigation actions,” stated Kimaren Ole Riamit, a Maasai and member of the Indigenous Peoples Advocacy Team on the GCF.*
Part of a package of three human rights-based policies, the Indigenous Peoples (IP) Policy represents a high-level rights-based benchmark for the Fund’s operation and for climate finance at large. The other equally important policies still up for adoption are those on gender and environmental and social implications of Fund’s operations.
For Eileen Mairena-Cunningham, an indigenous Miskitu from Nicaragua, “This adoption is a great step forward towards the recognition of our rights. It gives us clear and strong voice to say: We are here and now and our rights have to be respected!.”
“This is a sign of willingness of the GCF to recognize, respect and promote the rights of indigenous peoples in climate actions,” added Tunga Bhadra Rai, an indigenous Rai from Nepal.
As the outcome of a detailed and participatory process of elaboration and consultation with indigenous organizations, civil society and other stakeholders, the policy recognizes Indigenous Peoples’ rights to land, territories and natural resources, their crucial and active contribution to climate change mitigation and adaptation, and the importance of the knowledge of Indigenous Peoples and their livelihood systems.
It will also significantly contribute to enable effectiveness and support the transformative character of Fund’s initiative in adaptation and mitigation while delivering benefits to indigenous communities.
The relevance of international standards such as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and principles such as Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) are also acknowledged.
Once implemented it will offer an effective toolbox to improve the capacity of countries-recipient of GCF funds as well as Accredited Entities to fully and effectively engage Indigenous Peoples at all levels of climate policies and programs and prevent possible negative impacts of their activities on indigenous peoples’ rights.
Indigenous peoples’ organizations will therefore continue to engage with the Fund in the further steps of elaboration and adoption of operational guidelines, of the envisaged guidance on FPIC and new Environmental and Social Safeguards.
“The opportunity that the IP Policy opens to Indigenous Peoples is enormous. We still have a lot of work to do but we learned that with dedication and hard work, nothing is impossible,” said Helen Biangalen-Magata of Tebtebba. (Tebtebba and International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs on behalf of the IP Advocacy Team).
* The Indigenous Peoples Advocacy Team has been consistently participating in GCF processes to highlight indigenous peoples’ issues and concerns and has led efforts to adopt the IP Policy. It is composed of Indigenous peoples’ organizations and advocates: Centro para la Autonomía y Desarollo de los Pueblos Indígenas, Nicaragua; Indigenous Livelihoods Enhancement Partners, Kenya; Indigenous Peoples Foundation for Education and Environment, Thailand; International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, Denmark; Nepal Federation of Indigenous Nationalities; and Tebtebba.
By UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights
A UN human rights expert has called on all levels of government in the United States to adopt consistent practices when consulting with indigenous tribes on projects that could affect their rights, like the Dakota Access Pipeline.
The appeal was made by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, at the end of a mission to the US to assess the impact of energy development projects. During the visit, Ms. Tauli-Corpuz, noted that, in spite of a US commitment to positive and meaningful engagement with tribal governments, challenges remained.
The Special Rapporteur said: “The legislative regime regulating consultation, while well intentioned, has failed to ensure effective and informed consultations with tribal governments. The breakdown of communication and lack of good faith in the review of federal projects leaves tribal governments unable to participate in dialogue with the United States on projects affecting their lands, territories, and resources.”
Nevertheless, the Special Rapporteur saw encouraging steps being taken by federal agencies to follow procedures set out in the UN’s Declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples. She said: “Since 2012, the federal government has made commendable efforts to develop policies toward more robust measures.
“I also applaud the January 2017 joint report from the Departments of Interior, Army and Justice to solicit recommendations on engaging tribes in infrastructure-related activities. I am encouraged by the process of meaningful consultation with the tribes that the United States undertook in creating this report, and applaud the efforts made by the government to consider ways in which to improve consultation processes.”
In order to meet the obligations of the UN Declaration, Ms. Tauli-Corpuz said the United States should continue to build efforts to incorporate principles of meaningful consultation with the goal of obtaining free, prior, and informed consent from indigenous peoples as set out in the Declaration.
She added that given the impacts on indigenous peoples of the Dakota Access Pipeline, she was deeply concerned by a presidential memo on 24 January clearing away the last hurdle so that construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline under Lake Oahe could begin. The Special Rapporteur also expressed concern about similar issues on other projects.
The Dakota Access Pipeline issue and other examples in Ms. Tauli-Corpuz’s end of mission statement highlight the many water concerns associated with energy development. In places like the arid west, the substantial volumes of water used in drilling operations cause stress on water supplies. Contamination of underground and surface waters is also a concern, with many projects threatening vital resources in water-scarce regions.
Ms. Tauli-Corpuz said: “A recent Environmental Protection Agency study found scientific evidence that activities in the hydraulic fracturing water cycle can affect drinking water resources through spills, faulty well construction, discharges into surface waters, or disposal into underground injection wells. For indigenous peoples, water provides life, subsistence, and has undeniable spiritual significance. In Lakota, they express this belief as ‘Mni Wiconi: water is life’.”
However, the Special Rapporteur says the outlook is not entirely bleak. A number of tribes have made entrepreneurial efforts to create tribal utilities for the benefit of their own and neighbouring communities, and are involved in a wide array of energy generation and transmission as large parts of tribal lands are used for the national electrical grid system.
“Indian tribes are owners and operators of new and emerging technologies, breaking the mold of reliance on outside entities,” the Special Rapporteur says. “These examples and many more are proving that by exercising political sovereignty, indigenous peoples can approach energy resource development in a diverse way to support economic sovereignty.”
Indigenous communities in the United States want more control over their energy resources as part of their overall desire for self-determination with respect to their lands, territories, and resources. They are committed to balancing many different sets of concerns in their own approaches to energy development.
The tribes rely on the income generated from natural resources to not only support critical government programs, but also to balance the protection of their lands, waters, and sacred places with the benefit of revenue and jobs.
“I have been very impressed by the remarkable and unshakeable resolve tribes have to find creative ways towards self-determination. Two such companies include the Missouri River Resources, a wholly-owned tribal company by Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara Nation which is dedicated to using best practices in the oil and gas industry to generate economic benefits for the tribal community through responsible oil development. Similarly, the Red Willow Production Company, a company wholly owned and managed by the Southern Ute Tribe, has been generating revenue through oil and gas development on their reservation since 1992 and continues to maximize benefits for their tribal community while carefully managing their lands and resources.”
The Special Rapporteur says: “Tribes must continue to be supported to develop capacity and resources to realize self-determination to take advantage of their expanded authority in all areas including in energy development and law enforcement.
“I urge the government to continue to honour its treaty and trust obligations to indigenous peoples to ensure that native communities are not further plagued by violence,” said Ms. Tauli-Corpuz, adding that she hoped the government would provide adequate financing.
Finally, I recommend that for any extractive industry project affecting indigenous peoples, regardless of the status of the land, the United States should require a full environmental impact assessment of the project in consideration of the impact on indigenous peoples rights.”
During her official visit to the United States, Ms. Tauli-Corpuz met Government and State officials, a wide range of civil society and human rights organizations working on indigenous rights. She also visited indigenous communities to hear directly from them about their issues and concerns.
The Special Rapporteur will present a comprehensive report containing her findings and recommendations to the United States Government and the UN Human Rights in September.
The Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, Ms. Victoria Tauli-Corpuz (Philippines), is a human rights activist working on indigenous peoples’ rights. Her work for more than three decades has been focused on movement building among indigenous peoples and also among women, and she has worked as an educator-trainer on human rights, development and indigenous peoples in various contexts. She is a member of the Kankana-ey, Igorot indigenous peoples in the Cordillera Region in the Philippines.
The Special Rapporteurs are part of what is known as the Special Procedures of the Human Rights Council. Special Procedures, the largest body of independent experts in the UN Human Rights system, is the general name of the Council’s independent fact-finding and monitoring mechanisms that address either specific country situations or thematic issues in all parts of the world. Special Procedures’ experts work on a voluntary basis; they are not UN staff and do not receive a salary for their work. They are independent from any government or organization and serve in their individual capacity.
UN Human Rights, country page: United States
GENEVA, 23 February, 2018 - Disaster risk reduction partners are now considering a proposal to establish a new UNISDR Stakeholder Advisory Group and whole-of-society engagement strategy to support implementation of the global plan to reduce disaster losses, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction in coherence with the Paris Agreement on climate change and Sustainable Development Goals.
This follows two days of discussions this week attended by 50 representatives from the private sector, trade unions, farmers, education, community based groups, NGOs, indigenous people groups and the media who discussed how to collaborate with UNISDR on an all-of-society approach to reducing disaster risk for sustainable development. (See below for full list of participating organisations.)
Grace Balawag of Tebtebba, the Indigenous Peoples' International Centre for Policy Research and Education, a long-time UNISDR partner, said: “This will be an important platform for voicing the concerns of the indigenous people who are so often marginalized but can bring so much expertise and knowledge to adapt to climate change.”
UNISDR is proposing to create a new Stakeholder Advisory Group that will include 25 members representing all the major stakeholders and partners who will be able to engage as many constituents as possible at the regional, national and local level to implement the the Sendai Framework by 2030.
The members of the Advisory group will be self-elected for a period of two years and will provide guidance and inputs to UNSDR, and give a voice to, and defend the interests of, groups of people who can be most vulnerable to disasters if they are not engaged in disaster risk management and planning.
The Sendai Framework adopted in Japan in 2015 recognized the role of nine major groups and other stakeholders as critical to enabling an all-of-society engagement to achieve the Sendai Framework targets and priorities for action in order to make progress on reducing mortality, the numbers of disaster affected, reduce economic losses and damage to critical infrastructure.
“We want to leverage your expertise and your networks to reach out to local people and their communities,” concluded Shoko Arakaki, Chief, UNISDR Partnerships Branch, at the end of the session.
Many participants reacted very positively and welcomed the initiative and will now go back home and consult their constituents before the proposal to establish a UNISDR Stakeholder Advisory Group is expected to be finally adopted. This engagement mechanism will be also used as a consultation and feedback mechanism to plan and organize the next Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction which will be held in Geneva, in May 2019.
The consultation was attended by the Major Groups and other Stakeholders (MGoS) that are part of the MGoS High Level Political Forum Coordination Mechanism/Steering Group, namely: The Women’s Major Group (WMG), UN Major Group on Children and Youth (MGCY), Indigenous Peoples Major Group (IPMG), Farmers Major Group, NGO Major Group, Scientific and Technological (STC) Major Group, Workers and Trade Unions Major Group, Stakeholder Group of Persons with Disabilities, Volunteer Groups Alliance, Stakeholder Group on Ageing (SGA), Education and Academia Stakeholder Group (EASG), Together 2030 and CSOs for Financing for Development.
In addition to this there was representation from:
The Huairou Commission, Platform for Disaster Displacement, Integrated Research on Disaster Risk (IRDR), the Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction (GNDR), Platform on Disaster Displacement, UNISDR Science and Technology Advisory Group, International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), European Broadcasting Union, UPS Foundation, UNISDR Private Sector Alliance for Disaster Resilient Societies (ARISE), Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC), United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG), International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and the Swiss NGO DRR Platform.
197 environmental defenders have been killed in 2017 while protecting their community’s land or natural resources
Over the past year, in collaboration with Global Witness, the Guardian has attempt to record the deaths of all these people, whether they be wildlife rangers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or indigenous land rights activists in Brazil. At this current rate, chances are that four environmental defenders will be killed this week somewhere on the planet.
See full story here: http://bit.ly/2FXYJEk
Recent milestone agreements, such as the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, and the Paris Agreement have placed water at their heart. Guaranteeing sustainable water management is a vital element to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals and other relevant goals in the social, environmental and economic fields.
To implement these water related goals and targets building on the achievements of the previous “Water for Life” Decade 2005-2015, the International Decade for Action “Water for Sustainable Development”, 2018-2028 aims to create a solid platform to advance cooperation and partnerships at all levels, and put a greater focus on the integrated management of water resources.
The Decade will contribute to the achievement of these goals by facilitating the sharing of good practices and providing a platform for advocacy, networking and partnership building.
Date: 16-27 April 2018
Location: United Nations Headquarters, New York
Theme: “Indigenous peoples’ collective rights to lands, territories and resources”
The Forum members have decided on changes to the two week annual session. The first week will be all open plenary meetings. There will be no closed meetings during the first week.
A condensed schedule during the first week will see the Permanent Forum discuss all substantive agenda items.
During the second week of the 2018 session of the Permanent Forum, members of the Forum will hold informal meetings with representatives of indigenous peoples, Member States and UN entities. The purpose of these meetings will be to draw on information presented during the first week, and channel this into policy recommendations that are strategic, focused and actionable.
Indigenous representatives, Member States and UN entities that are accredited to attend the 2018 session of the Permanent Forum are invited to attend these meetings. More details will be available soon.
The request form for side events is now OPEN.
Online Registration for the 17th session (UNPFII17) is now OPEN.
For NGOs with ECOSOC Status, IPOs and Academics that have participated at previous sessions of the Permanent Forum:
- First, review and update your contact details in our integrated Civil Society Organizations (iCSO) System: http://bit.ly/unpfii-updatecontact
- Register by 2 April 2018: https://reg.unog.ch/event/23798/registration/
For New IPOs and Academics participating for the first time at a session of the Permanent Forum:
- First, read carefully our participation guide. You must create a new profile in our integrated Civil Society Organizations (iCSO) System. Download the Participation Guide for New NGOs and Academics: http://bit.ly/unpfii17-new-ipos-academics
- Deadline for online application for approval: 28 March 2018.
Please contact us at: firstname.lastname@example.org for questions related to your participation.
A giant array of solar panels near the famed sandstone buttes of Monument Valley has begun producing electricity for the Navajo Nation at a time when the tribe is bracing for the loss of hundreds of jobs from the impending closure of a nearby coal-fired power plant. The Kayenta Solar Facility is the first utility-scale solar project on the Navajo Nation, producing enough electricity to power about 13,000 Navajo homes. The plant comes at a time when the area's energy landscape is shifting.
Washington, DC, October 12, 2017 On October 12, 2017, the Department of State notified UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova of the U.S. decision to withdraw from the organization and to seek to establish a permanent observer mission to UNESCO. This decision was not taken lightly, and reflects U.S. concerns with mounting arrears at UNESCO, the need for fundamental reform in the organization, and continuing anti-Israel bias at UNESCO. The United States indicated to the Director General its desire to remain engaged with UNESCO as a non-member observer state in order to contribute U.S. views, perspectives and expertise on some of the important issues undertaken by the organization, including the protection of world heritage, advocating for press freedoms, and promoting scientific collaboration and education. Pursuant to Article II(6) of the UNESCO Constitution, U.S. withdrawal will take effect on December 31, 2018. The United States will remain a full member of UNESCO until that time.